“Things are not always what they seem; the first appearance deceives many; the intelligence of a few perceives what has been carefully hidden.” —Phaedrus
On that sunny October day in 2018 when a New Brunswick judge confirmed Megan Mitton’s 11-vote victory in Memramcook-Tantramar over her main rival Bernard LeBlanc, it was widely assumed that on-campus voting at Mt. A. was a key factor in the Green candidate’s narrow win over her Liberal opponent.
After all, David Suzuki himself — chosen by CBC viewers in 2004 as the Greatest Living Canadian — had urged students to vote for Mitton during his speech to a packed house at the university library.
But as that canny Roman writer Phaedrus once quipped, “Things ain’t always what they seem.”
A recent one-sentence e-mail to Warktimes from Memramcook-Tantramar Returning Officer William Hicks reads: “The 2018 Campus vote was 552 votes cast as shown under line P16 RO-BDS.”
Hicks was referring to a voting results table on page 112 of the Chief Electoral Officer’s report.
Line P16 RO-BDS shows that Mitton did indeed receive more campus votes than her main opponent. But her total of 233 was only 42 more than the 191 Bernard LeBlanc received. Etienne Gaudet of the PCs got 88 votes, while Hélène Boudreau of the NDP received 40.
To view the Elections NB table, click here.
In this election, Elections NB is not conducting on-campus polling, a decision that could hurt Mitton, but possibly not by as much as it would seem. The 2018 results suggest that campus Liberals were quietly effective in getting out their vote.
As I reported in 2018, a tally of results elsewhere in the riding showed that the predominantly French-speaking areas in the 12 polls in and around Memramcook overwhelmingly supported Bernard LeBlanc who received 1,852 votes to Mitton’s 638.
The results were reversed in the predominantly English-speaking town of Sackville’s 12 polls where Mitton received 1,583 votes to LeBlanc’s 686.
It’s seems likely — though not certain — that the lack of polling stations on university campuses as well as in long-term care homes could result in lower voter turnout.
And, the short 28-day summer campaign in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic may also lead to fewer voters getting out to the polls.
But Mount Allison Politics Professor Geoff Martin says the common assumption that a low turnout favours the party in power won’t necessarily hold true in this election.
“A lower voter turnout tends to mean that it’s partisans who are turning out and that means Conservatives and Liberals and other dyed-in-the-wool partisans of the other political parties,” he says.
“Right now there’s no party in New Brunswick that can really say ‘we are the party of the majority, we are a majority movement’ in the way that say, Louis Robichaud could say in the 1960s or Richard Hatfield could say in the 1970s and Frank McKenna could say in 1987,” Martin adds.
“It’s a very fractious, divided partisan environment,” he says, “so I don’t think that low voter turnout necessarily favours the government because it’s not really all that big a political movement in terms of the population that would pledge allegiance to the PCs or to the Liberals for that matter.”
Martin predicts the Conservatives will have a tough time in Memramcook-Tantramar partly because of their weak support among Francophone voters both here and across the province.
“In some ways, we probably pay a little too much attention to the riding-by-riding competition and not enough concern for the big province-wide competition,” he says adding that there’s always the possibility of support surging in a wave one way or another.
“Most of our elections historically are determined by a wave, a wave in favour of Frank McKenna, in favour of Bernard Lord or in favour of Brian Gallant,” Martin says.
“I’m not sure that the vote in this area is going to be all that much different than the way the vote shakes out province-wide. In other words, what do Francophones and what do Anglophones province-wide do in terms of partisan preferences,” he adds.
“This riding may be a microcosm of New Brunswick in more ways than one in the sense that the local vote may shake out similar to the province-wide vote.”
I guess we’ve always had to make a choice at the ballot box. Certainly the past outcomes have usually been a Liberal or Conservative proposition. Now we have additional parties making inroads and that’s democracy in action. No matter whether we have a majority or minority government, it’s time to start thinking about the debt mess we’re in. For real. Not that long ago the Graham govt contemplated selling NB Power to Quebec Power. Predictably, emotions rose up with temperaments that “we shouldn’t have Quebecers” determining our energy future. The truth is, that we’ve lived beyond our means. The former president of NB Power was chasing unicorns for promoting an alternative source with sea water! That’s only the tip of the waste iceberg. NB Power is 5 billion dollars in debt and sinking. Quebec Power was willing to absorb that debt and give NB a price like they give a city – like Montreal – 7.4 cents a KW instead of the 14 KW were paying now. We wouldn’t loose our regulatory body. Quebec Power would be clean, reliable, green hydroelectric power. If they took over NB Power they’d likely keep Lapreau and the Maqtequac Dam – the smoke belchers would likely be closed. Think of it this way – if your house was on fire, do you really care that the fire dept that comes to the rescue has Sackville, Dorchester or Point De Bute on the side of the fire truck? Lower power rates would help households. Imagine your power bill cut by a half or a third. Would lower power bills (and clean power) attract businesses and corresponding jobs to our province? Food for thought for all political parties and candidates.