Warktimes has obtained a copy of what appear to be the 20 recommendations issued by Montana Consulting Group following its 2021 workplace assessment of Sackville Fire & Rescue and, after careful consideration, has decided to publish them in the public interest.
Although the document does not contain a Montana Consulting letterhead or signature page, its contents closely correspond with the list of implemented actions released by Tantramar CAO Jennifer Borne in April.
The decision to publish the recommendations comes after five years of turmoil within the fire department including the departure of numerous firefighters and a renewed crisis on January 5th when 12 volunteers turned in their pagers, prompting the municipality to launch another workplace investigation.
Publishing the recommendations gives citizens the opportunity to judge for themselves whether the reforms proposed in 2021 were adequate to address the problems inside the department and whether greater public scrutiny could have helped prevent the crisis from continuing.
It also raises a broader question about transparency: why were recommendations dealing largely with governance, hiring practices, supervision, workplace procedures and accountability treated as confidential personnel information and withheld under New Brunswick’s Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (RTIPPA)?
Judicial decision
In April 2024, Mr. Justice Jean-Paul Ouellette of the Court of King’s Bench upheld Tantramar’s refusal to release the Montana report under RTIPPA, accepting the municipality’s argument that confidentiality is needed to protect the integrity of workplace investigations.
Warktimes is not publishing witness statements, allegations, interview notes or the workplace assessment itself. The document being released consists of the recommendations arising from that assessment. They focus mainly on changes to fire department governance, policies, procedures and accountability measures.
If those recommendations had been made public in 2021, residents, councillors and the media would have been able to monitor whether recommended reforms were actually carried out as additional firefighters continued to leave the department.
Once again, the town has classified the latest investigation by VanBuskirk Law as a personnel matter, and once again, that report and its recommendations are being withheld from the public.
Earlier this month, Councillor Alyssa Greene served notice that at a future council meeting she will introduce a motion directing CAO Jennifer Borne to disclose the VanBuskirk report to council and to prepare a comprehensive summary of its findings for the public.
The town argues that a section of RTIPPA prevents the release of personnel investigations, but the law is currently being challenged in an ongoing court case by the CBC on the grounds that it violates Canada’s Charter of Rights.
To read the 20 Montana recommendations, click here.
To read my earlier analysis of how many of the recommendations have been implemented, click here.
To read about the CBC’s case seeking to strike down Sections 20 and 21 of RTIPPA as unconstitutional, click here.

























Commentary: NB Power’s ‘Opposites Day’
by Logan Atkinson, Seniors for Climate Tantramar
Logan Atkinson, Seniors for Climate Tantramar
Fans of Sesame Street will recall the iconic video “Opposites Day,” in which Bert and Ernie learn all about opposites.
Whatever they do, the reverse is intended. Whatever they say, the opposite is meant.
Hilarious for adults, educational for kids.
In a stark example of life imitates art, members of Tantramar town council and residents who packed the chamber were treated recently to their own version of Opposites Day, as NB Power’s Chief Commercial Officer Brad Coady and his entourage appeared before town council on July 14th.
The ostensible purpose? To demonstrate transparency about the proposed 500 MW fossil-fuel power generating plant for Centre Village, to be built, owned and operated by the American firm PROENERGY.
But the result? Obscurity, unintelligibility, obfuscation.
Opposites Day indeed.
Mr. Coady presented to council for about 12 minutes, supported by a series of PowerPoint slides, and then seemed to artfully dodge a series of questions.
Did he enhance transparency in connection with the Centre Village proposal? Did he say anything at all to inform council and the public about this dangerous project? Or did he leave all of us more confused, more skeptical, than before?
Many examples might be cited to support the argument that the NB Power VP seemed more interested in obfuscation than in enlightenment.
In one case, he repeated the oft-quoted claim that the big, jet-engine turbines would operate only 7% of the time, apparently intending to ease our concerns about the combustion of fossil fuels, the poisoning of our climate, and the degradation of the delicate ecology of the Chignecto Isthmus.
Does this claim make any sense? Does it not strain credulity to suggest that a project whose costs approach $3.5 billion will lie idle 93% of the time?
NS connection
And what about the commitment to sell 100 MW of power to Nova Scotia, a commitment revealed to New Brunswick’s Energy and Utilities Board and the public on February 2nd.
If the Independent Electricity System Operator in Nova Scotia exercises its option to draw this power from New Brunswick, what effect would that have on the operation of the Centre Village plant?
Does this not give the lie to NB Power’s claim that the Centre Village plant is necessary only to meet crises of peak demand in New Brunswick? Will our friends in Nova Scotia accept mere intermittent supply, or will they insist on a steady, reliable source of needed power?
NB Power VP Brad Coady
Mr. Coady is quite agile at deflection. At one point in his presentation, he said that the Centre Village plant “…has something called a synchronous condenser capability, and that’s essential for integrating renewable energy.”
This statement, one can only assume, is meant to boost the claim that the Centre Village project would be a transitional resource, helping New Brunswick move away from fossil fuel combustion and toward a more fully renewable energy future.
But Mr. Coady’s logic here is suspect, at best. The clear implication of his words? Because we have synchronous condenser capability, you ought to believe us when we say that this plant is intended for transitional purposes only.
But the truth is that synchronous condenser capability is required by any addition of renewables to the grid; it is not logical to package it with a 25-year commitment to an American company to burn fossil fuels.
And so the deflection is on – please think of the synchronous condenser; please don’t think about fossil fuel combustion.
What about BESS?
One of the strikingly less expensive and increasingly available alternatives to fossil fuel peaker plants is battery storage, known as BESS (Battery Energy Storage Systems). See the very successful Oneida Energy Storage Project in Ontario, operating reliably since May 2025.
At the Tantramar council meeting, Mr. Coady said NB Power has a lot of interest in BESS, but that it’s hard to make a business case for it to the EUB.
While this may at one point have been true, it is certainly no longer the case. As reported by CBC News on March 18th, a BESS facility would be far less expensive and more reliable than a peaker plant. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nrstor-large-scale-battery-replace-tantramar-gas-plant-9.7131768
And in addition, it would provide these advantages without dangerous emissions, and without the heightened risks of exorbitant health and environmental costs. Much evidence to this effect was led by the highly qualified intervenors at the EUB hearings on the Centre Village project. And the Oneida Project in Ontario is living proof that it can be done.
“Transparency” or “Opposites Day” obfuscation?
NB Premier Holt
On July 22nd, CBC News quoted Premier Holt at the Charlottetown Premiers’ conference as saying that New Brunswick ought to be considered as the energy hub of the Maritimes. https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.7279906
An admirable ambition, but one that ought to be realized by the progressive development of clean, renewable energy supported by battery storage. This is not an ambition to be anchored in aging, dangerous, dirty technology from the last century that will harm our environment in every way at radical expense to New Brunswickers for decades to come.
Operating merely 7% of the time? Unbelievable. Synchronous condenser capability to give us all some comfort? Deflection from the real dangers of the project. Batteries too expensive? Contrary to all available evidence.
It’s become quite fashionable these days for corporate leaders and politicians to claim transparency, to promise transparency, to insist that they are committed to transparency.
But are these claims and promises real? Or are deflection and obscurity what the public is expected to suffer in the name of openness?
Transparency, or obfuscation? There may have been something educational for youngsters about Tantramar’s own version of Opposites Day, but is there anything hilarious there for the rest of us?
No. Not so much.
Logan Atkinson is a resident of Tantramar and a member of the Seniors for Climate Tantramar Steering Committee. scantantramar@gmail.com