Green MLA calls government proposals — including privatizing Mt. A. — ‘ridiculous,’ ‘shocking’ and ‘outlandish’

Tantramar MLA Megan Mitton in Tweedie Hall at Mt. A. in 2025

Tantramar MLA Megan Mitton is speaking out against the New Brunswick government’s suggestions for cuts to universities and colleges.

“I think the idea of privatizing Mount Allison is just one of the many terrible ideas the Holt government is floating right now when it comes to budget cuts,” the Green MLA said today in a telephone interview.

She was referring to a two-page document presented last week to New Brunswick university and college presidents that included a proposal to eliminate the provincial grant to Mt. A., but provide a “transition trust fund” so that it could become “an independent Canadian Premiere University.”

“Not having a profit motive for post-secondary education is one of the ways that public institutions stand out,” Mitton says.

“Ideally, we would be moving to make our public institutions more accessible as is the case in other countries where there’s lower tuition and in some cases, it’s even basically free.”

No final decisions

Post-Secondary Education Minister Jean-Claude D’Amours told reporters in Fredericton yesterday that the government is seeking post-secondary budget reductions of $35-$50 million, but he said repeatedly that the government has not made any final decisions.

The government’s two-page document says that the province’s priority sectors are health, skilled trades, early childhood education and schooling from kindergarten to Grade 12.

“In addition, meeting the needs of the labour market remain front and centre, as well as increasing productivity, and the important role of research and innovation,” the document adds.

“We don’t need to take away from say, liberal arts education versus more vocational. We can have both,” Mitton says, adding that community colleges need public support as well.

Post-Secondary Education Minister Jean-Claude D’Amours

The government document suggests closing some college campuses and merging others with universities.

“There are 20+ campuses in NB for 860,000 people,” it says. “Do we need them all?”

It also suggests reducing provincial grants for post-secondary education by 10% with no tuition increases and giving student aid only to New Brunswick students.

Mitton says such steps would make things much harder for students.

“We’ve seen a long-term trend of decreasing public financing for post-secondary education quite significantly,” Mitton says.

“Students who are among the least able to be able to pick up that slack financially are the ones doing it, which translates into significant debt for these often, young people who are looking to go out into the world after school and are saddled with tens of thousands of dollars of debt.”

Short-term thinking

She accuses the Holt government of engaging in short-term thinking in its pursuit of big budget cuts.

“Some of the things they’re proposing are going to have very negative impacts on our economy and our society,” she says, “especially on rural New Brunswick where they’re threatening to close smaller schools and things like that.”

Mitton says she finds some of the things in the government document “ridiculous” and “shocking.”

I would almost think that it wasn’t real because some of the things it mentions are so outlandish,” she adds.

“I’d say they really need to back away from this and take more time to really think through solutions at the table with the universities and the colleges rather than sort of springing this on everyone right before the budget’s tabled on March 17th.”

To read the government document, click here.

Posted in Mount Allison University, New Brunswick government | Tagged | Leave a comment

Province considers turning Mt. A. into a private university

Mount Allison convocation procession. Photo: Mount Allison University Facebook

Mount Allison could lose its provincial grant and become a private university under a range of options the New Brunswick government presented last week to university and college presidents.

“There is nothing specifically on the table,” Post-Secondary Education Minister Jean-Claude D’Amours told CBC today, adding the government’s ideas are a subject for discussion.

Other possibilities include merging St. Thomas University with the University of New Brunswick and closing Université de Moncton’s satellite campuses in Edmunston and Shippagan.

Mount Allison President Ian Sutherland sent an e-mail today to students and staff seeking to reassure them that the government hasn’t made any final decisions.

“To be crystal clear, to date, the government has not communicated any specific decisions, budgetary or otherwise, to Mount Allison, nor any other post-secondary institution,” he wrote.

Noting media reports about the province’s $1.3 billion deficit and possible implications for public education, Sutherland added: “should the government wish to discuss significant budgetary, policy, or structural change, such discussions cannot be responsibly carried out with short notice, a few weeks before the Government presents its budget.”

That budget will be brought down on March 17th.

Mount Allison’s latest financial statements show that the university received $27.5 million from the provincial government in 2025 with an additional $3.9 million in federal grants.

Student fees totalled $43.9 million.

Last year, Maclean’s magazine named Mt. A. the #1 undergraduate university for the 26th time.

A university news release in October credited Mount Allison’s continued success to its “small class sizes, close-knit community and hands-on learning opportunities.”

To read CBC coverage, click here.

Brunswick News has published a screenshot of the two-page document presented to university and college presidents listing questions for them to consider. Among other things, it asks whether the province could provide a “transition trust fund” to Mt. A. so that it could become “an independent Canadian Premiere University.”

Posted in Mount Allison University | 8 Comments

Tantramar council approves $3.3m tax breaks for housing projects

Councillor Bruce Phinney voted against tax incentives for two planned housing developments

At its meeting on February 10th, Tantramar Town Council voted to approve more than $3.3 million in tax rebates for two planned housing developments.

Council OK’d Artie Kenny’s application on behalf of Salem Properties Inc. for a rebate of $1.5 million. The company is planning to build a total of 87 residential units on its property at 112 Queens Road at an estimated value of $20 million.

Council also approved Eric Tusz-King’s application on behalf of Freshwinds Eco-Village Housing Co-operative for a rebate of more than $1.8 million. The co-op plans to build 68 residential units on its property at 64 Fairfield Road with an estimated value of $24 million.

Under the incentive program adopted by Sackville Town Council in 2020, developers pay half of the property tax they would otherwise owe over a 10-year period.

Phinney votes no

Councillor Bruce Phinney voted against the tax breaks explaining later that the program is far too generous.

“We need to review it and tone it down,” he said. “It’s much too extravagant. Do we need to give them that much?”

Phinney pointed to the $1.1 million rebate that developer John Lafford received for his six-storey, 72-unit apartment building at 131 Main Street and the $1.5 million Lafford and partner Mike Wilson received for a building currently under construction at York Street and Ford Lane with a total of 97 apartment units and about 10,000 square feet of commercial space.

“They’re going to develop anyway whether we give them an incentive or not,” Phinney said.

Stable rents

Freshwinds Eco-Village Co-op co-chair Sabine Dietz

Earlier, Sabine Dietz, co-chair of the Freshwinds Co-op, told council the tax breaks were justified for non-profit housing because they decrease operating costs.

“That means the rents for the co-operative can remain way more stable for 10 years,” she said.

“It’s not the same for a for-profit developer,” she added. “You will not know what this money is going to, you’re simply decreasing the tax income for the community.”

Dietz said the co-op is planning to start building this summer and hopes to complete the Freshwinds project by December 2027.

Co-op seeks changes

Meantime, Freshwinds is seeking council approval for an increase in the number of housing units it plans to build on its 21-acre site from 62 to a total of 68.

A planning report from the Southeast Regional Service Commission says that among other things, the co-op is proposing to add another apartment building while shifting from semi-detached to townhouse dwellings and changing the layout of the site.

Planner Sam Gerrand told council earlier this month that the co-op will provide more affordable housing including three-bedroom units suitable for families as well as some barrier-free or more accessible units.

Councillor Barry Hicks

“I’d like to say that I fully support this development, but I do not agree with adding any more units unless this has a proper street into it that is up to municipal standards and taken over by the municipality once the street is done,” said Councillor Barry Hicks.

He added he feels the roadway is too narrow for that number of units making access for fire trucks a safety issue.

Town Engineer John Eppell said he and the fire chief noted about a year ago that the site has an additional emergency exit.

He added that staff will examine the plans in more detail when the co-op applies for building permits.

In the meantime, town council will hold a public hearing on March 10th to hear any objections to the changes in the Freshwinds plans.

To read the background report on the tax incentives council approved for the two housing projects, click here.

Posted in Housing, Town of Sackville, Town of Tantramar | Tagged , | 2 Comments

EUB hears closing arguments for & against 400 MW gas/diesel plant on the Isthmus

NB Power lawyer John Furey addressing the EUB

The New Brunswick Energy & Utilities Board heard a wide range of closing arguments for and against the proposed gas/diesel generating plant near Centre Village Thursday during a hearing in Saint John that lasted about six-and-a-half hours.

“This matter, at its heart, is about energy security for the province of New Brunswick,” NB Power lawyer John Furey told the EUB.

He was referring to the utility’s “tolling agreement” with the U.S. firm PROENERGY to supply, own and operate eight combustion turbines that would generate up to 400 MW of electricity.

Furey said evidence showed that the utility needs the 400 MW starting in 2028 to meet rising demand and to avoid electricity shortages that could lead to rolling blackouts.

“The evidence supports the conclusion that combustion turbines are the preferred option, and indeed, in this case, the least-cost option,” Furey added.

While he acknowledged that the 25-year contract with PROENERGY might cost more than NB Power owning and operating the gas plant itself, he argued the American company would bring its expertise to the project and assume many of its risks.

Furey rejected arguments the EUB heard last week that battery energy storage systems (BESS) backed up by wind and solar could be cheaper and more efficient.

He maintained that it would cost more to install enough batteries to supply the electricity NB Power needs partly because batteries would not be as efficient as combustion turbines.

EUB Chair Christopher Stewart asked Furey what weight the board should give to environmental concerns as it considers the financial prudence of investing in a big gas plant.

“It emits greenhouse gases, batteries do not,” Stewart said. “And what weight should the Board put on that?”

“I’m pretty sure that the evidence establishes that actually the RIGS facility will lead to a decline in emissions,” Furey replied, adding that it would reduce the need for the fossil-fuel burning plants at Coleson Cove and Belledune.

The NB Power lawyer suggested that the EUB is an economic regulator that must also weigh the reliability of the electricity system.

“When you’re getting into the environmental considerations, I’m not saying they’re irrelevant from a societal perspective, but they are just that — they are a societal perspective, not, I would submit, a regulatory perspective,” Furey said.

To read NB Power’s closing brief, click here.

Financial concerns

Economics Professor Andrew Secord

St. Thomas University Economics Professor Andrew Secord highlighted financial concerns in his closing arguments.

“The consequences of this hearing are significant for NB Power’s customers, with the evidence suggesting that the revenue requirements over the 25-year period may be as high as $3.5 billion,” he said.

Secord added that NB Power will be required to pay guaranteed monthly payments to the PROENERGY subsidiary RIGS Atlantic to cover capital and operating costs in addition to a specified rate of return on the company’s investment.

“The question remains as to whether the tolling agreement as currently negotiated, sufficiently reduces the financial exposure of NB Power and its customers,” he said.

Secord suggested that he could not judge that for himself because almost all of the financial details in the documents have been redacted (blacked out) to protect NB Power’s commercial interests.

He added that, as an economic regulator, NB Power’s financial risks have to be a “primary concern” for the EUB.

To read Andrew Secord’s closing arguments, click here.

Unnecessary project?

Public Intervener Alain Chiasson

In his closing arguments, Public Intervener Alain Chiasson pointed to evidence from an expert witness he had hired.

Florida-based consultant Jeffrey Palermo testified last week that his review of the RIGS project showed that NB Power’s forecasts were wrong and the utility would not need electricity from the gas/diesel plant, known as the RIGS project, until at least 2030.

“If the board approves what turns out to be an unnecessary project,” Chiasson warned, “then NB Power’s customer will bear several billions of dollars in cost of that project for the next 25 years, eroding NB Power’s financial integrity, increasing customer rates, and potentially rendering costs to NB Power’s customers unaffordable in the long term.”

The public intervener, hired by the province to represent the public interest, took issue with an NB Power planning document showing looming electricity shortages.

“It is eight pages in length, including the cover pages, and is intended to support a commitment of several billions of dollars over 25 years,” Chiasson said. “It was done two years ago and much has changed since then.”

He urged the EUB to withhold approval for the gas plant giving NB Power more time to investigate alternatives such as battery energy storage.

“The lights will not go out if the RIGS project is denied. A denial allows the board more time to direct NB Power to provide a fully vetted proposal, including all possible alternatives,” he said.

No ‘social licence’

Economist Gregor MacAskill also pointed to the eight-page document that NB Power is using to justify the gas plant project in his closing arguments on behalf of the Protect the Chignecto Isthmus Coalition.

“PCIC submits that if this level of evidence is sufficient for NB Power to proceed with a 25-year, $3.5 billion project, it is no wonder that NB Power finds itself in financial difficulty and appears unable to avoid large capital project challenges,” MacAskill said.

Economist Gregor MacAskill

“Tantramar, as a community, only became aware of RIGS just before this process began, and we responded in very short order as best we could while holding full-time jobs and other commitments.”

MacAskill suggested that PCIC arguments against the gas plant could have been even more forceful if the Coalition had the time, staff and expertise available to others at the EUB hearings.

In its detailed, 48-page brief, PCIC recommends that the EUB provide help to interveners without legal representation to guide them through its complicated procedures.

“Centre Village is only a convenient site for RIGS, not for local residents who were never consulted before NB Power signed the contract with PROENERGY,” MacAskill said as he read from the PCIC brief.

“PCIC submits that this project does not have social licence, something NB Power representatives have said is important for the relationship it wants to have with communities across the province,” he continued.

“The dual site criteria involving the intersection of power and gas lines for RIGS is not a requirement for batteries, thus opening up a much greater range of suitable sites in the province for NB Power to deploy battery technology,” he said.

“Proper framing of environmental benefits would have comparisons of alternatives to meet the system needs, and batteries would have clear advantages as they do not emit GHGs, other air, water, or land pollutants, and do not require large volumes of water to operate.”

The brief adds that even if NB Power receives environmental approvals for its project, it would still face risks because of “issues with the site regarding air, water, and land resources.”

To read the PCIC brief, click here.

‘Rushed decision’

In her closing arguments, Konstantina Northrup, representing the Conservation Council of New Brunswick (CCNB), said electricity projects that rely on traditional sources of energy can’t be the standard in the province for very much longer.

“Not in the face of the climate emergency, which is acknowledged throughout New Brunswick Power’s evidence, including in the 2023 Integrated Resource Plan, and not in the face of the industry transformation that is happening globally and domestically to meet the challenges and the needs of our time,” she said.

Konstantina Northrup of CCNB

Northrup pointed to testimony from CCNB expert witness Toby Couture that global prices are falling rapidly for battery energy storage systems and she added that the prices for combustion turbines are trending upwards.

She argued that NB Power failed to consider lower-cost options in its rush to procure the 400 MW RIGS project which would produce an effective load carrying capacity of 360 MW.

She compared that to grid-scale batteries coupled with demand-response programs to reduce consumption.

“If we take 200 MW of battery storage and we add to that roughly 70 or 75 MW of demand response potential,” she said, “that gets us close to 300. It’s not all the way there, but it’s at least an option that is worth considering and exploring.”

Northrup said NB Power’s selection of the RIGS project was flawed because it was “a rushed decision-making process” and the utility fell back on “familiar choices and technologies.”

She noted that NB Power is now planning for an additional 600 MW of generating capacity.

“CCNB respectfully requests that if the Board determines this project is prudent, that the board set some clear directions, clear guidance to NB Power, that would help ensure that a rushed decision does not occur again,” she said.

“NB Power cannot continue through a sense of urgency to fall back on what is known and familiar when the realities of our time require transformation in the electricity system.”

Note: EUB Chair Christopher Stewart says the Board will make a decision on whether to approve the 400 MW gas plant project “as promptly and effectively as we can.” Meantime, the EUB has scheduled additional hearings in late March and early April on NB Power’s proposal to expand the 400 MW plant to generate an additional 100 MW for sale to Nova Scotia.

Posted in NB Power, Town of Tantramar | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

What did the Montana consultants recommend for Sackville Fire & Rescue?

While the Montana Consulting Group’s full workplace assessment of Sackville Fire & Rescue is cloaked in secrecy, its 20 recommendations are almost an open book.

The recommendations have not been officially made public, but former Sackville CAO Jamie Burke told Warktimes in 2022 that most are reflected in the new fire department bylaw passed by town council nearly four years ago.

In 2021, firefighters also received an oral briefing on the recommendations and several, including Kevin Scott, took detailed notes.

“We know what the 20 recommendations are. We know how many recommendations were implemented. We know how many haven’t,” he wrote on his Facebook page on February 7th.

Scott, who now volunteers with the fire department in Point de Bute, has been posting what he calls “A Daily Dose of Montana” on Facebook ever since.

His “daily doses” along with changes in the bylaw make it clear the consultants recommended shifting power and control away from the volunteers while placing it in the hands of the fire chief and CAO.

Key recommendations

—firefighters became part-time employees with higher wage rates.

— as employees, they are subject to the town’s social media use policy which bans any commentary that would reflect badly on how the town is run.

—firefighters must refer any media requests for information or comment to the fire chief.

— Montana also recommended that the town clarify the fire chief’s roles and duties.

Judging by his Facebook posts, Kevin Scott is especially concerned about a recommendation that under the town bylaw, all personnel issues would fall under the sole jurisdiction of the fire chief or the CAO.

“Let that one sink in for a minute!” Scott writes.

“Who does a firefighter go to when the issue is with both the CAO and the chief? When the two have each other’s backs, it makes for frustrating situations!” he adds.

“It’s frustrating to know how many issues that have been going on at the fire department over the last 10 years or more, that council has never been made aware of.

“Why is the position of the CAO so powerful that they don’t have to inform council of issues going on with the town?” he asks.

Other recommendations that were followed

—the old fire department constitution and internal bylaws, which gave firefighters the right to elect their own officers as well as a say in the hiring of new members, was eliminated and a formal hiring process was put in place.

—standard operating guidelines developed over the years by the firefighters were replaced by policies and procedures written by the chief in consultation with firefighters and the CAO and approved by town council.

—the grievance committee, which had never been set up, was replaced with a complaint procedure requiring volunteer firefighters to discuss their complaints with the chief and then, with the CAO.

Recommendations not followed

Kevin Scott points to one Montana recommendation that appears to be based on the consultants’ interviews with firefighters.

“This recommendation talks about following up during meetings on issues that were brought up through the chain of command or directly to the fire chief or the CAO to ensure accountability,” he writes.

“As a firefighter at Sackville Fire & Rescue, quite often we would bring up issues that would never get resolved or followed through and this recommendation was to help prevent that from happening,” he adds.

“Problem is, it hasn’t been implemented yet, which means the accountability is not there. It is one of the most important components of a fire scene, yet not important enough for the fire station?”

Scott says a key recommendation on favouritism within Sackville Fire & Rescue hasn’t been implemented either.

The Montana Consultants called on the town to revise the bylaw to establish formal rules to apply to all firefighters equally and if a complaint arises, there should be a meeting to discuss how to proceed with an investigation.

“Considering how many firefighters publicly stated this was happening within the fire department, I am disappointed that this recommendation hasn’t been implemented,” Scott writes.

“In my opinion, one of the more important recommendations from the Montana report was that the CAO should get feedback from firefighters, officers and other town employees who regularly interact with the fire chief. It was also considered that it should be done at least every three years. Many firefighters first met the CAO, who’s been in that position for over three years, after the 12 dropped their pagers off at town hall last month,” Scott writes.

“This is one of the easiest recommendations to implement and one of the more important ones. Had this been done, we probably wouldn’t be having this conversation,” he adds. “Could have saved the taxpayers a lot of money had this recommendation been implemented.”

For previous coverage, click here.

Posted in Sackville Fire & Rescue, Town of Sackville, Town of Tantramar | Tagged | 2 Comments

Former Sackville councillor calls for release of Montana report & suspension of fire chief pending results of investigation

Former Sackville Town Councillor Ken Hicks says he hasn’t heard yet whether Tantramar will release the 2021 Montana Report on the turmoil within Sackville’s fire department.

Hicks wrote to town council and CAO Jennifer Borne on January 21st formally requesting the release of the report after a dozen firefighters turned in their pagers on January 5th taking themselves off active duty.

That brought the number available to respond to emergencies to about 18, well under half the department’s full complement of 43.

Sackville commissioned the Montana Consulting Group to conduct a workplace assessment after Warktimes reported in April 2021 that about 17 volunteer firefighters had resigned over a five year period and that their resignation letters complained about persistent bullying, favouritism, harassment, sexism and safety violations in Sackville Fire & Rescue.

Public statements

Hicks also posted two public statements on his Facebook page, one of them, an open letter addressed to the mayor, council and administration, calling for the immediate suspension of Sackville’s fire chief pending the results of an investigation being conducted by a law firm in Saint John.

The town announced on January 16th that it had hired VanBuskirt Law to investigate the fire department workplace:

Hicks says he worries that the investigator will only be looking into breaches of the Workplace Harassment and Violence Policy of 2023 and that therefore, the investigation might be too narrow to deal with issues in the years before that policy was adopted.

In his Facebook posts, he accuses the town of failing to act on recommendations in the Montana report. The report itself and its 20 recommendations have never been made public on the grounds that New Brunswick’s right to information law prohibits the release of records and recommendations made by an investigator “in relation to a harassment investigation or a personnel investigation.”

New Brunswick’s Ombud and a Court of King’s Bench judge both agreed the town was right to withhold the report and its recommendations.

“We already paid for a workplace audit in 2021, and we already had the roadmap to fix this,” Hicks wrote, adding that Mayor Black now says that the Montana Consulting Group did not conduct a full-scale investigation in 2021 only a workplace assessment.

“The decision to start an actual investigation only now, after losing twelve firefighters, points to a catastrophic delay in leadership and a failure to act on known information,” Hicks writes.

In his open letter, Hicks says town council needs to play a more direct role in overseeing the fire department.

“I suggest a council led fire service oversight committee made up of three councillors and a firefighter representative to track and ensure implementation of the outstanding [Montana] recommendations,” he writes.

More managers

“Adding more management layers and ‘People and Culture’ managers now is just an expensive way to build a wall of protection around the Fire Chief and the CAO,” Hicks says, referring to the town’s announcement on January 13th that it had added a new position called Tantramar Fire Service Manager of People & Culture to its management ranks and would be recruiting a Director of Protective Services to oversee Tantramar’s three fire departments.

“We don’t need more six-figure salaries, we need accountability for the individuals who poisoned the well in the first place,” Hicks writes.

“The 12 firefighters are the solution, not the problem. These firefighters didn’t step away because they stopped caring about their neighbours, they stepped away because the toxicity at the top made it impossible to do their jobs safely.”

To read Ken Hicks’s open letter to mayor, council and administration, click here.

This is the first in a series on the crisis within Sackville Fire & Rescue. Next, what we do know about the Montana recommendations.

Posted in Sackville Fire & Rescue, Town of Sackville, Town of Tantramar | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

5 days of EUB hearings bring out demonstrators & experts debating complicated issues

Demonstrators march against proposed gas plant in Moncton on Thursday. Photo: Juliette Bulmer

About 30 demonstrators marched Thursday outside the Moncton hotel where the Energy & Utilities Board was holding hearings on NB Power’s plan for a 500 MW gas/diesel plant near Centre Village.

Midgic resident Juliette Bulmer says the demonstrators also spent about an hour inside the hearing room.

“Hotel staff tried to calmly stop us, but we just left all our signs outside the room and quietly and respectfully walked in and sat down,” she says.

“We knew we had a right to be there.”

On Friday, NB Power lawyer John Furey questioned witnesses Jeffrey Palermo and Dustin Madsen, both of whom were hired by Public Intervener Alain Chiasson.

Palermo, an energy consultant based in Boca Raton, Florida, has filed EUB testimony suggesting that NB Power’s forecasts are wrong and the utility does not need electricity from the gas/diesel plant.

In his evidence, Madsen, an accountant based in Calgary, questions whether NB Power’s decision to invest in a gas plant, owned and operated by an American company, is financially prudent.

Closing arguments

The EUB will meet again on Thursday, February 19th in Saint John to hear closing arguments from NB Power and various interveners.

The EUB has also scheduled additional hearing days from March 31 to April 2 to consider NB Power’s tentative agreement to sell 100 MW of gas-plant power to Nova Scotia.

Demonstrators chanted “No gas plant, No gas plant” as they marched in Moncton on Thursday. Photo: Juliette Bulmer

Two technical issues

(1) Many of the arguments this week in Moncton revolved around complicated technical issues about how much electricity NB Power needs to meet customer demand and how best to supply it.

The EUB heard that NB Power adheres to North American standards for the expected risk of days per year in which available generation may not meet demand.

That standard, called Loss of Load Expectation or LOLE, is set at 0.1 days per year — about 2.4 hours annually, or one day in 10 years. LOLE is a planning benchmark used to determine how much dependable capacity the system must have.

NB Power argues that to stay within that standard, it needs 400 MW of power from the proposed gas/diesel plant, particularly during winter peak periods.

Critics, including the Conservation Council of New Brunswick (CCNB), contend that if NB Power needs that electricity, grid-scale battery energy storage systems combined with wind and solar would be a cheaper way to supply it.

(2) This brings in a second technical issue known as Effective Load Carrying Capacity, or ELCC.

ELCC measures how much dependable capacity a specific power resource or asset contributes toward meeting the LOLE standard. In other words, it estimates how much that resource reduces the risk of supply shortfalls during peak demand.

NB Power argues that batteries and renewables provide less ELCC than firm gas generation, especially during prolonged winter peak conditions.

The utility contends that the province’s highest electricity demand typically occurs on frigid winter mornings, when solar output is minimal and wind generation can be variable, making dependable capacity during those hours especially critical for meeting the LOLE standard.

Critics, such as the CCNB, argue that rapid improvements in technology have made battery energy storage systems backed up by wind and solar a more cost-effective way of providing peak power quickly when needed.

To read Erica Butler’s CBC coverage, click here.

Photo: Juliette Bulmer

Posted in NB Power | Tagged , | Leave a comment

EUB hears conflicting testimony on proposed gas plant

Toby Couture testifying today in an online hookup

New Brunswick’s Energy & Utilities Board heard expert testimony today on battery energy storage systems (BESS) from Toby Couture, a graduate of Mount Allison University who went on to earn advanced degrees from the Université de Moncton and the London School of Economics.

Couture, who now runs his energy consulting firm E3 Analytics based in Berlin, Germany, said he’s been working in the energy sector for about 20 years advising governments, power system operators and other clients on all five continents.

“I think it’s quite clear that the power system and the energy system as a whole is undergoing quite rapid and profound transformation,” Couture told NB Power lawyer John Furey who spent more than an hour attempting to have him disqualified as an expert witness.

Among other things, Furey noted that Couture co-wrote a paper in 2007 for the Conservation Council of New Brunswick on energy self-sufficiency and was appearing today as an expert witness for the CCNB making him more of an advocate than an expert.

“You continue to believe that it’s important to transform the way that we use and produce energy?” Furey asked.

NB Power lawyer John Furey

“I think for anyone who works in the power sector, the only constant is change,” Couture replied.

“We’ve seen that going back to the emergence of early stage hydro power, the emergence of coal and thermal power plants, nuclear in the 1950s and 60s to gas turbines in the late 80s and early 90s to today,” he said.

After the EUB rejected Furey’s arguments and accepted him as an expert witness, Couture went on to argue that grid-scale batteries combined with renewable sources such as wind and solar could provide electricity more cheaply than the proposed 500 MW gas/diesel plant in Tantramar which would cost at least $3.5 billion over 25-years.

Couture also rejected arguments that batteries wouldn’t be able to provide enough power to prevent blackouts during winter cold snaps pointing to large-scale battery installations in the UK, China and California.

To read Couture’s written evidence, click here.

NB Power experts

Earlier in the day, the EUB heard testimony from Bruce Tsuchida and Jill Moraski, two members of the Brattle Group, a big American consulting firm that NB Power hired to assess the proposed gas/diesel generating plant.

Brattle Group Energy Associate Jill Moraski

While Tsuchida testified that battery energy storage could be seen as an alternative, he added that to the best of his knowledge, it would not be as reliable as combustion turbines.

Moraski testified that the consultants found the gas plant to be a prudent investment because of NB Power’s projections forecasting the need for additional electricity, the tight supply from neighbours including Hydro Quebec, the emergence of data centres, projected increases in the number of electric vehicles and population growth in New Brunswick.

“One primary reason was a pretty rapid growth in the customer base. I don’t know if unprecedented is the word, but certainly unexpected,” she said.

Tsuchida and Moraski acknowledged that they based many of their conclusions on figures and forecasting assumptions supplied by NB Power.

To read the Brattle Group report, click here.

Posted in NB Power, Town of Tantramar | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Former utility exec says NB Power’s proposed gas plant is 20 years out of date

Former utility manager Tim Hicks

A former senior manager with one of the largest electricity companies in the U.S. says NB Power should not be pushing a 500 MW gas plant as a solution to its energy needs.

“There are ideas for the environment that are better than building a gas, obviously carbon-based combustion power plant,” Tim Hicks said during a presentation to Tantramar Town Council on Tuesday.

“I worked as a senior manager for Southern California Edison in grid modernization. I gained a lot of knowledge there. I’d like to share a little bit of that with you,” he said.

Hicks returned home to Sackville three years ago after spending many years out of the country. He joined the local group Seniors for Climate Change – Tantramar after learning about the proposed gas plant on the Chignecto Isthmus.

He told council there are better solutions to meeting energy needs including what’s known as “time-of-use” or “time of day” power rates that would encourage NB Power customers to save money by shifting some of their electricity consumption to times when there’s less demand on the grid.

“At night, there’s very little power consumption,” he said, adding that about 20 years ago, for example, utilities in Ontario and California introduced cheaper, variable rates to encourage customers to run appliances such as dishwashers or clothes dryers during the night-time hours or very early in the morning.

“Typically, between 4 and 9 in the evening is when everybody’s consuming power,” he explained, and rates then could be more expensive, something like 28 cents per kilowatt hour while rates from 7 a.m. until 4 p.m. could be around 15 to 18 cents.

The real savings could come during the night-time hours (9 p.m. to 7 a.m) when he said NB Power could charge only six cents per kilowatt hour.

NB Power out of date

Smart meter. Photo: NB Power

“My question is why is it acceptable for NB Power to be more than 20 years or almost 20 years behind in this technology, in this simple solution and now they’re rushing to build a power plant,” he said.

Hicks said he understands why New Brunswickers are reluctant to sign up for the so-called “smart meters” that are needed to implement “time of use” pricing.

“There is a history of blunder after blunder after blunder and I can understand why the public has not trusted NB Power and maybe why they’ve delayed this because they oppose smart meters because they don’t trust NB Power to implement properly,” he said.

“An electric company has a monopoly. They own the wires and they own the towers,” he added, pointing to a conflict-of-interest when utilities generate and sell their own power.

“In California, they removed the power production from the business of providing electricity. They removed that conflict of interest, plus they incentivized power production to be green.”

Council support

Councillor Allison Butcher

“I think you’re kind of preaching to the choir here,” said Allison Butcher, one of several members of council who thanked Hicks for his presentation.

“We hear you. We are with you,” she said, adding that sometimes the town feels powerless to influence NB Power and the province.

“Unfortunately, as a municipal government, we have said we don’t agree with it [the gas plant], but I’m not sure it matters to them.

“So, I thank you for continuing to beat the drum.”

NB Power Plan

Meantime, St. Thomas University Economic Professor Andrew Secord asked NB Power about introducing “time of use” rates during this week’s Energy & Utilities Board hearings in Moncton.

Vice President Brad Coady replied those rates could come “as early as April 1, 2028,” but he cautioned it would depend on several factors including EUB rulings on how electricity rates are designed and the time that would be needed to educate customers.

Posted in NB Power, Town of Tantramar | Tagged , | 1 Comment

NB Power reluctant to say how much Isthmus gas plant would cost as EUB hearings begin

Demonstration organized by Action Cap-Acadie outside EUB hearings in Moncton. Photo: Juliette Bulmer

About 20 demonstrators chanting, “Hey, Hey, Ho, Ho, the gas plant has got to go,” marched outside the Moncton hotel today where the Energy & Utilities Board was about  to open five days of hearings on NB Power’s plans for a 500 MW generating plant on the Chignecto Isthmus.

The demonstration was organized by Action Cap-Acadie which had invited everyone to “stand with us to protect our land, our health, and a clean-energy future.”

After the hearings began, various interveners spent the day quizzing five NB Power executives about their proposal to pay an American company to build, operate and eventually decommission the gas/diesel plant in Tantramar.

NB Power panel was cross-examined by interveners during the 1st day of hearings. L-R: Kevin Wright, Jordan Russell, Brad Coady, Darren Clark, Jonathan Pollock

St. Thomas University Economics Professor Andrew Secord asked the NB Power executives for a “ballpark figure” on what the gas plant would cost the utility over its projected 25-year lifespan.

NB Power Vice President Brad Coady seemed reluctant to answer.

“We’re not the builder of the project, we’re not the owner of the project, so we don’t know the full capital cost,” he said, suggesting nevertheless that NB Power did have “a good line of sight” on what it might cost every year.

“We do think it’s a significant amount of money, if I could say it that way,” he added.

EUB Chair Christopher Stewart

“I’m not sure you answered Dr. Secord’s question,” EUB Chair Christopher Stewart said. “I think he was asking if you could give him some kind of ballpark number.”

“We can’t say on the record what it would cost us per year,” Coady answered, finally adding that over its lifespan, the capital cost of the plant would amount to more than a billion dollars.

He said NB Power would also have to cover the U.S. company’s operating and financing costs including return on equity and return on debt, plus any insurances.”

Although Coady didn’t mention it at today’s hearing, NB Power would also be required to cover the costs of burning diesel fuel and imported natural gas.

Dramatic exchange

PCIC Intervener Chris Rouse

Chris Rouse, intervener for the Protect the Chignecto Isthmus Coalition questioned the NB Power panel about their contention that 400 MW from the gas plant would be used to generate electricity that is needed in New Brunswick, with an additional 100 MW for sale to Nova Scotia.

New Brunswick’s 400 MW would be generated by eight gas turbines (8 units) with two additional ones (2 units) generating power for Nova Scotia. (Each unit would generate 50 MW: 8 x 50= 400 MW; 2 x 50 = 100 MW).

Brad Coady repeated today what he has said at various public meetings: The province could run short of power unless it gets that 400 MW from the proposed gas plant.

But Rouse pointed to a chart from an NB Power document that appears to show half of the 400 MW could be exported undermining NB Power’s claim that without that power, New Brunswickers could face rolling blackouts starting in 2028.

NB Power chart with the financial details blacked out

Coady responded that the table was created to show various ways of thinking about how NB Power could lower the cost of satisfying the province’s need for 400 MW.

“Just to make sure there is no confusion in the room, there is now only one expansion toll agreement, one contract for offtake with our neighbours,” he said referring to the tentative export deal with Nova Scotia for 100 MW.

“But the table says four units for in-province,” Rouse responded. “You just told us at the very beginning that this 400 MW was for in-province. This table is only showing 200 MW for in-province.”

“Again, just to make sure there’s no confusion, this was just two options,” Coady answered.

“NB Power’s thinking never deviated from about 400 megawatts, or in this case, eight-unit option for a total of 376 megawatts net to the system. That’s been our base-case-thinking all along,” he said.

The EUB hearings continue Tuesday at the Delta Beauséjour in Moncton starting at 9 a.m.

For Erica Butler’s, CBC coverage, click here.

Posted in NB Power, Town of Tantramar | Tagged , | 2 Comments

130 scientists & academics call on Premier Holt to suspend proposed 500 MW gas plant

Susan O’Donnell. Photo: NB Media Co-op

Energy activist and Adjunct Research Professor Susan O’Donnell says NB Power’s proposal to burn more fossil fuels shows it’s stuck in the dinosaur age.

“It’s like NB Power management are lumbering along in an alternative universe where’s there’s no climate crisis,” she writes in an e-mail to Warktimes.

O’Donnell was commenting on a letter signed by 130 New Brunswick scientists and professors asking Premier Holt to suspend NB Power’s proposed gas/diesel generating plant on the Chignecto Isthmus.

O’Donnell helped organize and circulate the letter calling on Holt to ask NB Power to issue tenders for an electricity battery storage project instead and redirect investments to renewable sources and energy efficiency.

Among other things, the letter points out that the gas/diesel plant would be built and operated by the Missouri-based company PROENERGY at a time when Canada should be reducing its dependence on the United States.

It also warns that the project would make New Brunswick dependent on fluctuating prices for shale gas piped in from the U.S.

The letter says that the gas plant would threaten human health as well as the health of 165 rare or protected animal species while emitting an additional 900,000 tonnes of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.

In her e-mail, O’Donnell disputes NB Power’s claim that it will run short of power by 2028 because of population growth.

“Planned data centres are driving growth projections,” she writes.

“We need to be talking as a province about what kinds of industrial and community development we want that respect the limits of a finite planet and ensure a sustainable future.”

To read the letter to Premier Holt and the names of those who signed it, click here.

Posted in climate change, Mount Allison University, NB Power, Town of Tantramar | Tagged | 29 Comments