
Lower Rockport resident Crow Robichaud at the Pecks Cove Bridge where recent 16 tonne weight restrictions are preventing fire trucks from reaching her community
Lower Rockport resident Crow Robichaud says she’s pleased that the provincial department of transportation and infrastructure (DTI) has announced plans to construct a temporary detour bridge so that fire trucks will be able to cross into her community.
She says the 10 full-time residents in her area are currently facing a public safety nightmare because the province has imposed new 16 tonne weight restrictions that prevent fire trucks from crossing the Pecks Cove Bridge.
In a statement e-mailed to Warktimes Wednesday, DTI explains that the decision to change the weight restriction last month from 20 tonnes to 16 was made to ensure that the bridge can operate safely until it is replaced.
“While no repairs are currently planned for the structure, a detour bridge is planned for construction next to the existing bridge before the end of 2026,” the DTI statement says.
“It will be an enormous relief for the residents when we have full fire protection services,” Robichaud writes in a message to Warktimes.
During an interview Tuesday before the DTI announcement, she explained why she feels current fire services are inadequate.
“We have a Band-Aid solution that they can get some men and women across the bridge in a smaller vehicle and some water storage on a local property sort of midway in Rockport and Lower Rockport,” she said.

Tantramar has provided three storage tanks containing 3,000 litres of water to fight fires on the other side of the Pecks Cove Bridge. Photo: Crow Robichaud
Robichaud predicts the gravel road on the far side of the bridge will soon start deteriorating because heavy graders can’t cross to maintain it.
“What happens if there’s an auto accident down there and they can’t get the fire truck across with the jaws of life?” she asks.
Aside from safety concerns, Robichaud says the Pecks Cove Bridge can’t handle the weight of trucks that pump septic tanks, deliver hay to a local farmer or firewood to local residents.
“So, it’s affecting a lot of people in many different ways,” she says.
“And you know, we have no other route out.”
Tantramar MLA Megan Mitton, who has been pressing the government over several years to fix the bridge, says she’s relieved to hear about plans for a detour bridge this year.
“This is a public safety issue,” she writes in an e-mail to Warktimes.
“I’m glad DTI has finally understood the urgency that I’ve been communicating to them, and provided some more detail on how they will respond.”
Tantramar Mayor Debbie Wiggins-Colwell describes DTI’s announcement as “very good news.”
She adds it would be a lot better if construction were to begin sooner on a permanent bridge.
“But we’ll take what we can get as long as the community is safe,” she says.
Earlier this week, Wiggins-Colwell wrote to DTI Minister Chuck Chiasson requesting provincial action on the Pecks Cove Bridge.
To read her letter, click here.
























Commentary: NB Power’s ‘Opposites Day’
by Logan Atkinson, Seniors for Climate Tantramar
Logan Atkinson, Seniors for Climate Tantramar
Fans of Sesame Street will recall the iconic video “Opposites Day,” in which Bert and Ernie learn all about opposites.
Whatever they do, the reverse is intended. Whatever they say, the opposite is meant.
Hilarious for adults, educational for kids.
In a stark example of life imitates art, members of Tantramar town council and residents who packed the chamber were treated recently to their own version of Opposites Day, as NB Power’s Chief Commercial Officer Brad Coady and his entourage appeared before town council on July 14th.
The ostensible purpose? To demonstrate transparency about the proposed 500 MW fossil-fuel power generating plant for Centre Village, to be built, owned and operated by the American firm PROENERGY.
But the result? Obscurity, unintelligibility, obfuscation.
Opposites Day indeed.
Mr. Coady presented to council for about 12 minutes, supported by a series of PowerPoint slides, and then seemed to artfully dodge a series of questions.
Did he enhance transparency in connection with the Centre Village proposal? Did he say anything at all to inform council and the public about this dangerous project? Or did he leave all of us more confused, more skeptical, than before?
Many examples might be cited to support the argument that the NB Power VP seemed more interested in obfuscation than in enlightenment.
In one case, he repeated the oft-quoted claim that the big, jet-engine turbines would operate only 7% of the time, apparently intending to ease our concerns about the combustion of fossil fuels, the poisoning of our climate, and the degradation of the delicate ecology of the Chignecto Isthmus.
Does this claim make any sense? Does it not strain credulity to suggest that a project whose costs approach $3.5 billion will lie idle 93% of the time?
NS connection
And what about the commitment to sell 100 MW of power to Nova Scotia, a commitment revealed to New Brunswick’s Energy and Utilities Board and the public on February 2nd.
If the Independent Electricity System Operator in Nova Scotia exercises its option to draw this power from New Brunswick, what effect would that have on the operation of the Centre Village plant?
Does this not give the lie to NB Power’s claim that the Centre Village plant is necessary only to meet crises of peak demand in New Brunswick? Will our friends in Nova Scotia accept mere intermittent supply, or will they insist on a steady, reliable source of needed power?
NB Power VP Brad Coady
Mr. Coady is quite agile at deflection. At one point in his presentation, he said that the Centre Village plant “…has something called a synchronous condenser capability, and that’s essential for integrating renewable energy.”
This statement, one can only assume, is meant to boost the claim that the Centre Village project would be a transitional resource, helping New Brunswick move away from fossil fuel combustion and toward a more fully renewable energy future.
But Mr. Coady’s logic here is suspect, at best. The clear implication of his words? Because we have synchronous condenser capability, you ought to believe us when we say that this plant is intended for transitional purposes only.
But the truth is that synchronous condenser capability is required by any addition of renewables to the grid; it is not logical to package it with a 25-year commitment to an American company to burn fossil fuels.
And so the deflection is on – please think of the synchronous condenser; please don’t think about fossil fuel combustion.
What about BESS?
One of the strikingly less expensive and increasingly available alternatives to fossil fuel peaker plants is battery storage, known as BESS (Battery Energy Storage Systems). See the very successful Oneida Energy Storage Project in Ontario, operating reliably since May 2025.
At the Tantramar council meeting, Mr. Coady said NB Power has a lot of interest in BESS, but that it’s hard to make a business case for it to the EUB.
While this may at one point have been true, it is certainly no longer the case. As reported by CBC News on March 18th, a BESS facility would be far less expensive and more reliable than a peaker plant. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nrstor-large-scale-battery-replace-tantramar-gas-plant-9.7131768
And in addition, it would provide these advantages without dangerous emissions, and without the heightened risks of exorbitant health and environmental costs. Much evidence to this effect was led by the highly qualified intervenors at the EUB hearings on the Centre Village project. And the Oneida Project in Ontario is living proof that it can be done.
“Transparency” or “Opposites Day” obfuscation?
NB Premier Holt
On July 22nd, CBC News quoted Premier Holt at the Charlottetown Premiers’ conference as saying that New Brunswick ought to be considered as the energy hub of the Maritimes. https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.7279906
An admirable ambition, but one that ought to be realized by the progressive development of clean, renewable energy supported by battery storage. This is not an ambition to be anchored in aging, dangerous, dirty technology from the last century that will harm our environment in every way at radical expense to New Brunswickers for decades to come.
Operating merely 7% of the time? Unbelievable. Synchronous condenser capability to give us all some comfort? Deflection from the real dangers of the project. Batteries too expensive? Contrary to all available evidence.
It’s become quite fashionable these days for corporate leaders and politicians to claim transparency, to promise transparency, to insist that they are committed to transparency.
But are these claims and promises real? Or are deflection and obscurity what the public is expected to suffer in the name of openness?
Transparency, or obfuscation? There may have been something educational for youngsters about Tantramar’s own version of Opposites Day, but is there anything hilarious there for the rest of us?
No. Not so much.
Logan Atkinson is a resident of Tantramar and a member of the Seniors for Climate Tantramar Steering Committee. scantantramar@gmail.com