EUB holds 1st day of hearings on NB Power’s proposed gas/diesel plant on the Isthmus

Justin Urquhart, NB Power VP of Finance

New Brunswick’s Energy & Utilities Board (EUB) held more than five hours of hearings today on NB Power’s application to avoid the regulator’s financial scrutiny of its controversial proposal for a 500 MW gas/diesel generating plant on the Chignecto Isthmus.

Justin Urquhart, NB Power’s Vice President of Finance testified the plant should not be considered a capital project because it would be built and owned by the American company PROENERGY under a 25-year power-purchase, leasing agreement.

The provincial Electricity Act requires EUB approval of any NB Power capital project over $50 million, but the law does not clearly define what a capital project is.

Urquhart was asked why NB Power described its deal with PROENERGY as a partnership in a news release it issued on July 14th.

“NB Power is not a formal partner that one might expect in a conventional business relationship of being an ownership interest in the joint venture or anything else,” he replied.

“I think partnership in this context was being pulled more from the NB Power new strategic plan Energizing our Future which talks about doing business differently and finding ways for broader partnerships,” he said.

Earlier, NB Power’s lawyer John Furey succeeded in persuading the three-member EUB panel to strike from the record parts of an affidavit filed by accounting expert Dustin Madsen who had been hired by the province’s energy watchdog known as the Public Intervener for the Energy Sector.

Although the panel agreed to certify Madsen as an accounting expert, it ruled he was not qualified to comment on provisions of the Electricity Act that require EUB scrutiny of capital projects.

The ruling means, for example, that the board will disregard part of Madsen’s affidavit that says the EUB should interpret the term “capital project” based on its grammatical or ordinary meaning and that it should consider accounting guidance and legal precedents from other Canadian jurisdictions.

Meantime, NB Power has hired accounting expert Tarah Schulz who filed her own affidavit and also testified today that under international financial reporting standards (IFRS), leasing agreements are fundamentally different from assets or investments that a business entity owns and controls.

Public Intervener

Alain Chiasson, Public Intervener

In a written brief filed with the EUB, Alain Chiasson, the Public Intervener argues that the gas/diesel generating plant should be considered a capital project, one that brings with it considerable financial risks that could affect power rates.

During today’s EUB hearing, he pointed to a $70 million electricity switching facility that would connect the new generating plant to the grid.

PROENERGY would build the switchyard, then sell it for $1 to NB Power because under the electricity act, only NB Power can build and operate new transmission facilities in the province.

“We respectfully submit that the Switchback Assets alone represent a capital project with a total projected capital cost of $50 million or more which fulfills the requirements of section 107(1) of the Electricity Act,” Chiasson’s brief states, adding that therefore, under the law, it must be approved by the EUB.

The board will reconvene at 9:30 Friday morning to hear oral arguments from various parties including NB Power, the Public Intervener for the Energy Sector and Moe Qureshi of the Conservation Council of New Brunswick.

To read the heavily redacted “tolling agreement” between NB Power and its PROENERGY partner, click here.

To read a transcript of the hearings, click here.

This entry was posted in Environment, NB Power and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to EUB holds 1st day of hearings on NB Power’s proposed gas/diesel plant on the Isthmus

  1. Carol says:

    Thanks again Bruce for your excellent reporting! You have helped me better understand all the intricacies around how NB Power is scheming to avoid this American-owned Gas/Diesel plant being considered a capital project which would then make it subject to EUB rules and assessments.

    More power to Alain Chiasson, the Public Intervener who is looking out for the interests of NB ratepayers!

  2. Jon says:

    The federal government has a buy Canadian policy for crown corporations. Having a major NB crown corporation twisting around rules to avoid oversight and put money into a US corporation during a trade war started by the US is beyond embarrassing. It demonstrates how much NB Power needs a new board and new management.

    • Eric Morin says:

      I believe that this procurement process started well before elbows up, and I believe there could be truth in their claim that there are no Canadian companies providing this service or responding to the RFP.

  3. Carol says:

    I agree with you Jon.

  4. Eric Morin says:

    Like most NB taxpayers, I am no fan of many of NBP’s past business decisions, but engaging in a long-term power purchase agreement is likely the cheapest and best way to solve this need for additional generation on behalf of the ratepayers. The argument over whether this is a capital project or not is ridiculous and a waste of taxpayers’ money; the EUB’s work here should be to focus on the power purchase agreement itself and whether it’s a good deal with limited risk for us.

Leave a Reply to Eric MorinCancel reply