Gas plant critics accuse NB Power, PROENERGY of ‘bait and switch’ over Indigenous partnership

Barry Rothfuss, AWI executive director

Local opponents of the proposed 500 MW gas plant near Centre Village are accusing NB Power and its American partner PROENERGY of practising “bait and switch” tactics in attempting to get public support for their joint project.

“For months, PROENERGY and NB Power used the promise of First Nations’ partnership to quiet intense community, health care and environmental opposition,” Barry Rothfuss, executive director of the Atlantic Wildlife Institute says in a news release.

“Now that they have pushed through their initial approvals, they have uncoupled the project from Indigenous equity, proving that the original reconciliation narrative was just a public relations tactic used for commercial advantage,” he adds.

Rothfuss was reacting to NB Power Vice President Brad Coady’s comment this week that the gas/diesel plant could go ahead without an Indigenous financial or equity partnership.

Coady told reporters in Sackville on Tuesday that although Indigenous participation would be “a highly desired outcome,” it is not essential for the project to gain regulatory approvals from the Energy & Utilities Board or under the provincial environmental impact assessment.

‘Greenwashing’

Coady’s comments have led Rothfuss and five other opponents of the gas plant to update their previous complaint to the federal Competition Bureau to include what they claim is a “false narrative” about Indigenous reconciliation that is “direct evidence of corporate deception and federal greenwashing.”

The original complaint accused PROENERGY of making misleading statements about the health effects of the gas plant on the local community and NB Power of making misleading statements about the financial risks to provincial ratepayers.

Their complaint also accused NB Power and its American partner of the deceptive practice of “greenwashing” by using the acronym “RIGS” that stands for “Renewables Integration and Grid Security” to create the false impression that the project’s primary purpose is to support green energy.

Recent changes to the Competition Act prohibit companies from using greenwashing to promote their business interests in ways that would make them appear to be more environmentally friendly or less environmentally damaging than they really are.

NB Power VP Brad Coady speaking to Tantramar Town Council

In a telephone interview Friday, Rothfuss also pointed to Coady’s statements during his presentation to Tantramar Town Council acknowledging that the gas plant would produce higher levels of greenhouse gas emissions in the region when it is generating electricity.

“I understand that there’s concerns that the emissions in this region will go up and that is a fact,” Coady told council.

He added however, that overall emissions across the province would go down because the gas plant would enable NB Power to stop burning dirtier fuels as more intermittent renewables such as wind and solar are brought onto the grid.

Coady also pointed out that the gas plant would burn fuels to generate power, on average, only 7% of the time.

Transboundary pollution

Rothfuss says Coady’s acknowledgment that emissions will rise across the region confirms concerns about pollution crossing provincial boundaries which is a federal issue that would not be covered under a provincial environmental impact assessment.

“These peaker plants do environmental harm,” he says, “and it doesn’t matter whether they’re operating 5%, 10%, or 7% of the time because they run dirty when they start up and the impact can be devastating, especially from a human public health perspective.”

He adds that the health and environmental harms are well documented from the thousands of peaker plants operating across the globe.

Earlier this month, Rothfuss wrote to federal Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin requesting a full federal environmental review of the project partly because of transboundary pollution issues.

On Friday, he updated his request mentioning Coady’s admission to council that greenhouse gas emissions will rise across the region and that PROENERGY is now planning to truck wastewater from the site, possibly to a disposal facility in Halifax.

Constitutional treaty rights

Federal Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin. Photo: Mélanie Provencher, House of Commons

Rothfuss’s latest letter to Dabrusin also mentions Coady’s comment about the project going ahead without an Indigenous partnership and calls on the federal government to honour its obligation under Section 35 of Canada’s constitution to respect aboriginal treaty rights.

“The federal Crown cannot stand by as a passive observer while a crown corporation explicitly bypasses the necessity of Indigenous consent on unceded territory, particularly when the ongoing Mi’kmaw Rights Impact Assessment remains highly contested and incomplete,” his letter states, referring to the rights impact assessment being conducted on behalf of New Brunswick’s nine Mi’kmaq First Nations.

Rothfuss says he finds it frustrating that NB Power began by claiming there was Indigenous participation.

“They gave people the illusion that it was there and now they’re coming back and saying, ‘it’s not there, and therefore, we don’t really need it because it’s not required,'” he says.

“Well, it is required and the point I’m trying to make with the federal government is that it’s their mandate to regulate this and make sure that the Indigenous communities are being treated fairly and brought to the table for consultation, and that they’re heard,” he says.

This entry was posted in Environment, Indigenous affairs, NB Power, Town of Sackville, Town of Tantramar and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Gas plant critics accuse NB Power, PROENERGY of ‘bait and switch’ over Indigenous partnership

  1. Elaine MacDonald says:

    So the more that comes out as this project ‘progresses’, the more we learn that it’s bordering on a “we’ll do what we want and don’t care what others say” ideas.

    My additional concerns outside of this being a US backed/created project and now the concerns of support in case things go wrong, is considering the US has now decided to continue it’s insanity in the Middle East, the materials needed to make the plant are going to cost MUCH more (aka gas/diesel).

    Whereas the costs of batteries is still, unless it’s changed, going down.

    Just how much longer will this project be any cheaper/feasible than, say ANYTHING else that could be done (geothermal, battery, wind, solar, etc?)

    I know we won’t get honest answers from NB Power, so does anyone know who COULD give us reliable, honest answers?

  2. IndieMediaEastcoast Canada says:

    https://podbay.fm/p/insights-with-don-mills-and-david-campbell/e/1778766049

    May 14, 2026

    This week’s Insights podcast, Michelle Robichaud, President of the Atlantica Centre for Energy and Heidi Leslie, CEO of Crux Energy Consulting join Don and David to discuss a new report prepared for the Atlantic Energy Collective. Entitled An Atlantic Canadian Energy Future, the report outlines the state of the energy sector in the region. There are many important energy projects on the drawing board from Gull Island in Labrador to offshore wind in Nova Scotia. Robichaud and Leslie make a compelling case that the region would be better off if there was greater collaboration within Atlantic Canada among governments and energy utilities. From the importance of natural gas to the potential of ‘behind the meter’ electricity production, they go deep but explain things in a way that is relatable to a general audience.

  3. S.A. Cunliffe says:

    Don Mills in Halifax and David Campbell in Moncton [jupia.ca] of Acadia Broadcasting Podcast provided this interview of Coady and MacIsaac.. for your information.

    https://podbay.fm/p/insights-with-don-mills-and-david-campbell/e/1778239565

    Show notes
    On this week’s Insights podcast, we speak with John MacIsaac, President of ProEnergy Global Solutions Canada Ltd. and Brad Coady, Chief Commercial Officer, NB Power, about an important new initiative, the Renewable Integration Grid Security Project (RIGS). In recent years, more of the region’s electricity demand has been supplied by wind, solar and other renewable sources. The challenge is that this electricity is only produced when the wind is blowing or the sun is shining. The RIGS project is meant to ensure the grid has enough electricity to meet demand, even on the coldest day in February. RIGS will provide up to 500 MW of electricity as needed, support grid stability in New Brunswick, and provide benefits to Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island.

Leave a Reply