Tantramar’s Chief Administrative Officer says the town received no notification on April 1st when the province closed Highway 106, the main route between Sackville and Dorchester.
Jennifer Borne says she expected such notification from the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure (DTI) because of the need to inform police and fire in case of an emergency on either side of the washed-out highway.
“We were not notified and the information that I was given from their district engineer was to follow them on Twitter,” Borne said during the second in a series of community meetings held today at the Anglican Church Hall in Mount Whatley.
She was responding to a question from Sackville resident James MacDonald who wondered why the town did not inform residents of the road closure until the morning of April 3rd.
Borne suggested there should be “a direct line of communication” in such situations between a municipality and DTI.
She said town managers have now been asked to monitor New Brunswick 511 to stay up to date on road conditions in Tantramar.
‘Extreme disconnect’
“There seems to be an extreme disconnect between DTI and the citizens,” said Sackville resident Percy Best.
He spoke of his frustrations trying to persuade the province to clear trees and brush from the sides of roads including the one that runs to Trueman’s Blueberry Farm near Aulac.
“This has gone on for like 20 years of growth,” Best complained.
“It’s extremely dangerous. If a deer jumps out, you’re going to drive into the front of another car or go into the ditch yourself to avoid it,” he said. “DTI seems to be in a no-man’s-land and they do not respond to citizens’ complaints.”
Best contrasted uncleared roadways here with the ones in PEI where, he said, you could play golf on the sides of their roads.
“These days with the mulchers, bushwackers and what have you, it’s a simple job,” he said.
Holding their ‘feet to the fire’
“Most of the departments within the government don’t really want to hear from citizens, especially DTI it seems,” said Mayor Andrew Black.
He noted over the last 12-13 years, there’s been a spending shortfall on provincial roads of about $40 million.
“One of the big things is that the government needs to put more money into highway funding across the province.”
He added that some municipalities have managed to get DTI to come up with five-year asset management plans for provincial roads within their boundaries and once those plans are in place, they can hold DTI accountable for carrying them out.
“Some municipalities have had success with that and it holds the department’s feet to the fire, so if there’s some way that we can do that within Tantramar, I think that would benefit all of us greatly,” he said.
Busy beavers
In the first community meeting in Dorchester on Thursday, Black announced that DTI had agreed to install a temporary bridge so that Highway 106 can be re-opened by early July instead of waiting for road reconstruction to be completed in September.
Percy Best reported at today’s meeting that he had gone out to the site of the highway washout and wearing rubber boots, had crawled inside the big culvert there.
“That four-foot culvert has a 30-inch high beaver dam located halfway through,” he said. “They constructed a dam, the water couldn’t get through,” he added, “and that’s what created the washout.”
Best criticized DTI for failing to clear the culvert.
“So, they’re not even taking a close look at the problem,” he said. “An ounce of prevention is worth, in this case, a tonne of fixing.”
Darlene Hicks-Phinney said that, years ago, when her husband worked for DTI, he talked for days about the discovery of a beaver dam inside that Highway 106 culvert.
“So, it’s the second time for sure that it’s happened,” she said.
“The culvert was fine,” Best said. “It was the beavers that caused the problem, so they should be the ones to go fix it,” he added as everyone laughed.
UPDATE on Monday, May 27/24
Warktimes sent a link to this story to DTI’s communications officer, but so far, has received no comment in response.
However, Tantramar Engineer Jon Eppell told town council on Monday that DTI does not believe that beavers built a dam inside the culvert blocking water flow and causing the highway washout.
“I was talking with the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure district engineer about the culvert on Rte. 106,” Eppell said, “and DTI is of the opinion that in fact, what happened is that the culvert pipe collapsed and the debris got trapped there and got infilled with some silt.
“They don’t believe that it was actually a beaver dam.”
Eppell said the culvert was scheduled to be replaced next year and the design for a new pipe is ready.
He added that DTI is now seeking environment approvals so that a new culvert can be in place this year.




“Most of the departments within the government don’t really want to hear from citizens” -Mayor Andrew Black
Wins the prize for most ironic statement by an elected official.
Council, and the mayor, haven’t been the best examples of valuing public participation.
When all is said and done the bureaucrats are the people we pay to serve citizens.
Department Workers receive their daily orders and follow standard procedures. There are stories of people doing more when it needs to be better, and they are punished. In this case fill and patch a sink hole was the road crew were ‘mandated to do’. Not poke around and find out why. That’s another department. If it were ever thus, eh?
The Municipal Roadshow is exactly that. I know they take all matters seriously, and I’m really excited that these sessions are designed to encourage open communication and address the many, many, many failures of Amalgamation.
The irony is that the provincial argument for centralization municipally is contrary to the provincial argument for decentralization federally where “bringing government closer to the people” is the favoured principle. It can be argued that there is a case to save money because there are fewer politicians, but they almost become full-time with huge salaries and large staffs, costing more.
The first Road show was a success for me because the CAO made clear that council was adhering to the principals of ‘policy governance’ with the statement to the assembly that Councillor Debbie Wiggins-Colwell is not our councillor, but all councillors are.
Furthermore there are not any standing committees; the work of council shall be performed by council of the whole. This is a type of social engineering that circumvents centuries of improving deliberative responsible government accountable to citizens.
The entire local governance reform is a construct of sorts and so is that line: “We’re in this together, and we’re excited about the journey ahead.”
The Mayor in a heated discussion was forth right a by-law skirts Roberts Rules basically making the Mayor’s office what is known as the Strong Mayor system (example Olivia Chow Toronto) that pretty much lets him do what he wants.
This Mayor is council’s only connection to the CAO and the town staff. This a disaster. Read “New Brunswick the Brain Dead Province”. I feel sorry for our councillors. whom we thought were TO represent us, but are just FROM a ward as geographically representatives.
So we’re left with councillors as pumpkins with no brains and have to hire consultants for almost everything. The need for consultants balloons because council has no oversight of how day to day decisions that may lead to huge conflicts between Council (responsible and accountable) just because the councillors weakened and deprived of information are not capable of performing their fiduciary duties.
The number one flaw in the ‘policy governance”.
Number two failure is that using a ‘long handled screw driver’ in a crisis cost lives. (example ongoing Fire and police protection services needs). The worse is yet to come for Tantramar this just the start “Car Wreck”. Tantramar the Latest “crash Test” dummies.
We HAD Westminster parliamentary law to ensure that the will of the majority shall prevail, but always with full protection of the rights of the minority, by the ART of PERSUASSION, to become the majority. Especially note the words, “by the art of persuasion,” thus not by trickery or deceit.
It is my duty of care as a former member of many boards, councils, commissions, and development corporations to share with you some of the observations gleaned from these past experiences.