Mt. A. expert says Higgs government unlikely to push hard on municipal reform

Mt. A. politics professor Geoff Martin

An expert on municipal government in New Brunswick says the Higgs government risks political suicide if it presses too hard on municipal reform.

Geoff Martin, a politics professor at Mount Allison University, says that may be why the commitment to reform seemed so weak in Tuesday’s Speech from the Throne.

“It’s a lot more timid than I expected,” Martin says referring to the government’s promise “to have a new conversation with citizens of this province” about how to improve a fragmented municipal system with 104 local governments, 236 local service districts (LSDs) and 12 regional service commissions.

“Governments have been saying they’re going to have conversations about municipal reform for 10, 15, 25 years,” Martin says. “I would have thought that they would have something more definite to say right now.”

He argues that one of the system’s biggest problems involves the rural LSDs which have no elected representatives and are governed by officials in Fredericton.

“We do badly need rural elected democracy,” Martin says. He adds, however, that rural residents may not want it especially in a neoliberal age when people have become so accustomed to austerity and cuts in services that they look with suspicion on any increase in taxes.

“You’re going to hit a high degree of opposition in rural New Brunswick from people who figure that the only thing municipal reform really can mean is tax increases for them,” he says.

“They won’t necessarily focus on any of the benefits they could get,” Martin says, adding that many rural residents aren’t aware of how the property taxes they pay don’t cover the full cost of the services they receive for such things as road maintenance, snow plowing, policing, fire protection and emergency services.

He points to figures showing that while the average tax rate in 2019 was only 97 cents per $100 of assessment in the LSDs, the average rate in cities, towns and villages was $1.52. (Sackville’s residential property tax rate is $1.56.)

recently updated report from the association that represents the eight cities of New Brunswick claims LSDs receive about $100 million more in subsidies than they pay in taxes:

Excerpt from 8 cities report, August 2020

Martin, who wrote a 25-page academic paper on municipal reform for the Journal of Canadian Studies in 2007, says that making significant changes would take all the political capital the government has this term.

“I think it’s either you do municipal reform or you do health-care reform, you can’t do both,” he says, adding that either could jeopardize the re-election chances of a government with a narrow majority.

“I personally think Blaine Higgs will see health care as a higher priority and if he’s got to make a sacrifice, it’s going to be for changes in health care, not for changes in the municipal sector,” Martin says.

“Maybe the throne speech promise on municipal reform is so timid because the government has finally figured out, Gee this is not going to be easy, this is going to be very controversial and there’s a good chance we won’t be able to do very much of what we’ve hinted we want to do,” he concludes.

This entry was posted in Mount Allison University, New Brunswick politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Mt. A. expert says Higgs government unlikely to push hard on municipal reform

  1. D.Key says:

    From this report it would appear that those of us living in the rural residential zone of Sackville receive the same services as those in the LSDs and pay twice the taxes. The conclusion would be that not only do we subsidize the LSDs, but also the remainder of the town. Those who rent in town also pay twice the taxes. The current system has many deficiencies and injustices which no one seems to be willing to fix.

  2. Percy Best says:

    One usually thinks that cities have a much higher property tax rate than that paid by towns because they are gifted with many more ‘creature comforts’ than those enjoyed by most town citizens, for instance, subsidized public transit systems.

    Fredericton dropped their ‘inside the serviced area’ rate by almost two points this year from 1.4505 to 1.4311. Sackville on the other hand has just about the top rate in NB for towns and are sitting at 1.5600. Now the real kicker comes in when one considers that Fredericton has an incredibly low rate of 1.0733 for their unserviced areas, which would be equivalent to our Mount View Road, half of Walker Road, Pond Shore Road, Frosty Hollow etc.

    Sackville, sadly and wrongly, does NOT have a Fredericton type split rate and as a result every home owner within all of our town boundries pay the exceedingly high primary rate. A $200,000 home in an unserviced area of Fredericton would pay $2,146 in property taxes and for the same type of home in Sackville the taxes would be $3,120. That is NOT equal and fair taxation.

    We were initially set up the same as Fredericton is today, back in the late 1970’s and 80’s, but the Town Councils of the day kept sneaking up the rate so everyone was the same tax level in order to try to force people to build only within the town core and that does not seem to be working, except for the apartment boxes of course.

    The tax rate where I live now was set at .25 in 1978, and the old Town core was .60, just after the unwanted amalgamation took place and the rate where I built is now over six times higher. We, in Sackville, are one of the highest taxed home owners in New Brunswick and NB is the second highest property taxed province in all of Canada.

    Our Town Managers have to do a better job of money management in order to get our tax rate lowered if they seriously want to see a population increase instead of the current decline as indicated by the last Census.

Leave a Reply to D.Key Cancel reply